“Beyond the Watershed: Why Junk Food Advertising Rules for Children Need Better Design” by Hannah White
- May 12
- 4 min read
Updated: May 13
Article Title: Beyond the Watershed: Why Junk Food Advertising Rules for Children Need Better Design
Author: Hannah White
Date Published: May 7, 2026
Publication: Agora Review
Category: Opinion Article
Discipline(s): Public Health, Public Policy, Media Policy
Keywords: junk food advertising; children; HFSS; obesity policy; digital marketing; UK regulation; food environment; child health
Suggested Citation: White, Hannah. “Beyond the Watershed: Why Junk Food Advertising Rules for Children Need Better Design” Agora Review, May 7, 2026.
Download Full Article PDF
Overview
The United Kingdom’s new restrictions on advertising less healthy food and drink to children were introduced with a serious and legitimate goal: reducing young people’s exposure to persuasive marketing for products high in fat, salt, and sugar. That goal deserves support. This article argues, however, that the policy is too narrow and too easy for the food industry to route around. A rule focused mainly on TV watershed timing and paid online advertising may reduce some exposure, but it does not adequately address the broader marketing ecosystem through which children now encounter unhealthy food brands, including influencer content, brand advertising, sponsorship, packaging, and promotions inside retail environments. The evidence strongly suggests that food marketing affects children’s preferences, choices, and consumption, which means regulation is justified. But it also suggests that partial restrictions tend to work best when they are part of a more comprehensive strategy rather than a stand-alone fix. If governments are serious about protecting children, they should move beyond symbolic ad bans and adopt more integrated policies that target digital marketing, close brand-level loopholes, improve transparency, and make healthier food environments easier to navigate in everyday life.
Author’s Note
I chose this topic because food advertising policy often creates an unusual kind of debate. On one side, critics of regulation can sound as though restrictions on junk food marketing are simply another example of government overreach. On the other, supporters sometimes speak as though passing a headline-grabbing ad ban is enough to count as serious action. What interested me was the space between those two positions.
The more I read, the clearer it became that the underlying public health problem is real. Children are highly exposed to persuasive marketing for unhealthy foods, and that marketing affects what they want and what they eat. At the same time, I became less convinced that narrowly designed advertising laws are always the best response. If children are seeing food promotion through influencers, sponsorships, brand advertising, and retail placement, then a policy aimed mainly at one slice of paid advertising may look tougher than it really is.
In this article, I argue for regulation, but against treating a limited advertising rule as if it were a complete solution. My position is that governments should regulate more seriously, not less—but with designs that reflect how food marketing actually works now. I wanted to make that case in a way that acknowledges the good intentions behind current policies while still questioning whether they are ambitious or coherent enough to meet the problem.
References
[1] Department of Health and Social Care. Restricting advertising of less healthy food or drink on TV and online: products in scope [Internet]. London: UK Government; 2025. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/restricting-advertising-of-less-healthy-food-or-drink-on-tv-and-online-products-in-scope
[2] Boyland E, McGale L, Maden M, Hounsome J, Boland A, Angus K, et al. Food marketing, eating and health outcomes in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2025. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/food-marketing-eating-and-health-outcomes-in-children-and-adults-a-systematic-review-and-metaanalysis/4E66E9C31D358152D107F44A71DE9D03
[3] World Health Organization. WHO recommends stronger policies to protect children from the harmful impact of food marketing [Internet]. 2023 Jul 3. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/03-07-2023-who-recommends-stronger-policies-to-protect-children-from-the-harmful-impact-of-food-marketing
[4] World Health Organization. Reducing the impact of marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages on children [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/food-marketing-children
[5] Department of Health and Social Care. Response to brand advertising exemption from advertising restrictions for less healthy food or drink [Internet]. London: UK Government; 2025. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/brand-advertising-exemption-from-advertising-restrictions-for-less-healthy-food-or-drink/outcome/response-to-brand-advertising-exemption-from-advertising-restrictions-for-less-healthy-food-or-drink
[6] Department of Health and Social Care. Landmark junk food ad ban to protect kids' health [Internet]. London: UK Government; 2026 Jan 5. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/landmark-junk-food-ad-ban-to-protect-kids-health
[7] Fretes G, Colchero MA, et al. Digital marketing of unhealthy foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children and adolescents: a narrative review of the global evidence and policy implications. Curr Dev Nutr. 2025. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299125000046
[8] Potvin Kent M, Pauzé E, Roy EA, de Billy N, Czoli C. The marketing of unhealthy food and beverages by social media influencers popular with children on TikTok, YouTube and Instagram. Pediatr Obes. 2024. Available from: https://foodpolicystudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024-Potvin-Kent-junkfluenced-the-marketing-of-unhealthy-food-and-beverages-by-social-media-influencers.pdf
[9] Carroll JE, et al. Children's perception of food marketing across digital platforms. Appetite. 2024. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38560403/
[10] The Advertising (Less Healthy Food and Drink) (Brand Advertising Exemption) Regulations 2025 [Internet]. London: UK Government; 2025. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1011/made
[11] Department of Health and Social Care. Less healthy food or drink: advertising and promotions restrictions [Internet]. London: UK Government; updated 2026 Mar 25. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/less-healthy-food-or-drink-advertising-and-promotions-restrictions
[12] Carpentier FRD, Correa T, Reyes M, Taillie LS. Restricting child-directed ads is effective, but adding a time-based ban is better: evaluating Chile’s food marketing policy. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20:58. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10214667/
[13] Jensen ML, Correa T, Reyes M, Taillie LS. Examining Chile's unique food marketing policy: TV advertising and dietary effects after implementation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:105. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8073213/
[14] Global Food Research Program. Marketing regulations: Chile [Internet]. 2025. Available from: https://www.globalfoodresearchprogram.org/policy-research/marketing-regulations/
[15] Healthy Eating Research. Evidence-based recommendations to mitigate harms from digital food marketing to children ages 2–17 [Internet]. Durham (NC); 2024. Available from: https://healthyeatingresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/HER-Digital-Marketing-Report-2024.pdf
[16] Pineda E, Smith M, Brage S, et al. Food environment and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence, 2020–2025. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024. Available from: https://nutrition.bmj.com/content/early/2024/04/21/bmjnph-2023-000663